Personnaliser

OK

Informations importantes : Arrêt du Club R (13 août) et Cessation d'Activité (30 septembre)

En savoir plus.

DEBATING PROCREATION DEB ETH P - Benatar

Note : 0

0 avis
  • Soyez le premier à donner un avis

105,56 €

Produit Neuf

  • Ou 26,39 € /mois

    • Livraison à 0,01 €
    Voir les modes de livraison

    rarewaves-uk

    PRO Vendeur favori

    4,8/5 sur + de 1 000 ventes

    Expédition rapide et soignée depuis l`Angleterre - Délai de livraison: entre 10 et 20 jours ouvrés.

    Publicité
     
    Vous avez choisi le retrait chez le vendeur à
    • Payez directement sur Rakuten (CB, PayPal, 4xCB...)
    • Récupérez le produit directement chez le vendeur
    • Rakuten vous rembourse en cas de problème

    Gratuit et sans engagement

    Félicitations !

    Nous sommes heureux de vous compter parmi nos membres du Club Rakuten !

    En savoir plus

    Retour

    Horaires

        Note :


        Avis sur Debating Procreation Deb Eth P de Benatar Format Broché  - Livre Philosophie

        Note : 0 0 avis sur Debating Procreation Deb Eth P de Benatar Format Broché  - Livre Philosophie

        Les avis publiés font l'objet d'un contrôle automatisé de Rakuten.


        Présentation Debating Procreation Deb Eth P de Benatar Format Broché

         - Livre Philosophie

        Livre Philosophie - Benatar - 01/01/2016 - Broché - Langue : Anglais

        . .

      • Auteur(s) : Benatar
      • Editeur : Oup Us
      • Langue : Anglais
      • Parution : 01/01/2016
      • Format : Moyen, de 350g à 1kg
      • Nombre de pages : 276
      • Expédition : 794
      • Dimensions : 21.0 x 14.0 x 1.6
      • ISBN : 9780199333554



      • Résumé :
        David Benatar is Professor and Head of Philosophy at the University of Cape Town, South Africa. He is the author of Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence (Oxford), and The Second Sexism: Discrimination Against Men and Boys (Wiley-Blackwell). David Wasserman works at the Center for Bioethics at Yeshiva University and is a Visiting Scholar in the Department of Bioethics of the National Institutes of Health. He has written extensively on ethical issues in reproduction, disability, genetics, biotechnology, and neuroscience....

        Biographie:

        • Introduction
        • By David Benatar and David Wasserman
        • Part One
        • Anti-Natalism
        • By David Benatar
        • 1. Introducing Anti-Natalism
        • 2. The Asymmetry Argument
        • 3. The Quality of Life Argument
        • 4. The Misanthropic Argument
        • 5. Contra Procreation
        • Part Two
        • Pro-Natalism
        • By David Wasserman
        • 6. Better to Have Lived and Lost?
        • 7 Against Anti-Natalism
        • 8. The Good of the Future Child and the Parent-Child Relationship as Goals of Procreation
        • 9. Impersonal Constraints on Procreation
        • 10. Alternatives to Impersonal Approaches: Birthrights and Role-Based Duties
        ...

        Sommaire:
        While procreation is ubiquitous, attention to the ethical issues involved in creating children is relatively rare. In Debating Procreation, David Benatar and David Wasserman take opposing views on this important question. David Benatar argues for the anti-natalist view that it is always wrong to bring new people into existence. He argues that coming into existence is always a serious harm and that even if it were not always so, the risk of serious harm is sufficiently great to make procreation wrong. In addition to these philanthropic arguments, he advances the misanthropic one that because humans are so defective and cause vast amounts of harm, it is wrong to create more of them. David Wasserman defends procreation against the anti-natalist challenge. He outlines a variety of moderate pro-natalist positions, which all see procreation as often permissible but never required. After criticizing the main anti-natalist arguments, he reviews those pronatalist positions. He argues that constraints on procreation are best understood in terms of the role morality of prospective parents, considers different views of that role morality, and argues for one that imposes only limited constraints based on the well-being of the future child. He then argues that the expected good of a future child and of the parent-child relationship can provide a strong justification for procreation in the face of expected adversities without giving individuals any moral reason to procreate...

        Détails de conformité du produit

        Consulter les détails de conformité de ce produit (

        Personne responsable dans l'UE

        )
        Le choixNeuf et occasion
        Le service clientsÀ votre écoute
        LinkedinFacebookTwitterInstagramYoutubePinterestTiktok
        visavisa
        mastercardmastercard
        klarnaklarna
        paypalpaypal
        floafloa
        americanexpressamericanexpress
        Rakuten Logo
        • Rakuten Kobo
        • Rakuten TV
        • Rakuten Viber
        • Rakuten Viki
        • Plus de services
        • À propos de Rakuten
        Rakuten.com