Linguistic Intuitions - Schindler, Samuel

. .

Résumé :
Samuel Schindler is Associate Professor of Philosophy of Science at the Centre for Science Studies at Aarhus University in Denmark. His research focuses on methodological and epistemological issuesin the history and philosophy of science. His publications include Theoretical Virtues in Science: Uncovering Reality Through Theory (CUP, 2018). He was the PI of the project 'Intuitions in Science and Philosophy' (2016-2019), which investigated how intuitions can serve as evidence.

Anna Dr?d?owicz is postdoctoral researcher at the University of Oslo. She received her PhD from the University of Oslo in 2015. From 2016 to 2018 she was a postdoctoral researcher on the project 'Intuitions in Science and Philosophy' at the Centre for Science Studies, Aarhus University. She works primarily on the philosophy of mind and language, but has also published papers in philosophical methodology, psycholinguistics, and the philosophy of psychiatry.


Karen Br??cker holds a PhD in Science Studies and an MA and BA in Linguistics from Aarhus University. Her research focuses on theoretical linguistics and philosophy of linguistics, in particular the theoretical assumptions underlying the use of linguistic intuitions as evidence for theories of grammar. Her PhD was part of the project 'Intuitions in Science and Philosophy' at the Centre for Science Studies, Aarhus University.


...

Biographie:

• 1: Karen Br?cker, Anna Dr?d?owicz, and Samuel Schindler: Introduction


• Part I: Accounts of linguistic intuitions


• 2: Steven Gross: Linguistic intuitions: Error signals and the Voice of Competence


• 3: Georges Rey: A defence of the Voice of Competence


• 4: Michael Devitt: Linguistic intuitions again: A response to Gross and Rey


• 5: Karen Br?cker: Do generative linguists believe in a Voice of Competence?


• 6: John Collins: Semantic and syntactic intuitions: Two sides of the same coin


• 7: Anna Dr?d?owicz: Intuitions about meaning, experience, and reliability


• 8: Carlos Santana: How we can make good use of linguistic intuitions, even if they aren't good evidence


• Part II: Experiments in syntax


• 9: Frederick J. Newmeyer: The relevance of introspective data


• 10: Sam Featherston: Can we build a grammar on the basis of judgments?


• 11: Carson T. Sch?tze: Acceptability ratings cannot be taken at face value


• 12: Jon Sprouse: A user's view of the validity of acceptability judgments as evidence for syntactic theories


• 13: Jana H?ussler and Tom S. Juzek: inguistic intuitions and the puzzle of gradience


• 14: Samuel Schindler and Karen Br?cker: Experiments in syntax and philosophy: The method of choice?