Personnaliser

OK

Current Controversies in Values and Science -

Note : 0

0 avis
  • Soyez le premier à donner un avis

Vous en avez un à vendre ?

Vendez-le-vôtre

102,79 €

Produit Neuf

  • Ou 25,70 € /mois

    • Livraison à 0,01 €
    • Livré entre le 3 et le 17 août
    Voir les modes de livraison

    RiaChristie

    PRO Vendeur favori

    4,9/5 sur + de 1 000 ventes

    Brand new, In English, Fast shipping from London, UK; Tout neuf, en anglais, expédition rapide depuis Londres, Royaume-Uni;ria9781138390287_dbm

    Publicité
     
    Vous avez choisi le retrait chez le vendeur à
    • Payez directement sur Rakuten (CB, PayPal, 4xCB...)
    • Récupérez le produit directement chez le vendeur
    • Rakuten vous rembourse en cas de problème

    Gratuit et sans engagement

    Félicitations !

    Nous sommes heureux de vous compter parmi nos membres du Club Rakuten !

    En savoir plus

    Retour

    Horaires

        Note :


        Avis sur Current Controversies In Values And Science de Format Broché  - Livre Philosophie

        Note : 0 0 avis sur Current Controversies In Values And Science de Format Broché  - Livre Philosophie

        Les avis publiés font l'objet d'un contrôle automatisé de Rakuten.


        Présentation Current Controversies In Values And Science de Format Broché

         - Livre Philosophie

        Livre Philosophie - 01/11/2019 - Broché - Langue : Anglais

        . .

      • Editeur : Routledge
      • Langue : Anglais
      • Parution : 01/11/2019
      • Format : Moyen, de 350g à 1kg
      • Nombre de pages : 198
      • Expédition : 272
      • Dimensions : 22.9 x 15.2 x 1.1
      • ISBN : 9781138390287



      • Résumé :
        Current Controversies in Values and Science asks ten philosophers to debate five questions (two philosophers per debate) that are driving contemporary work in this important area of philosophy of science. The book is perfect for the advanced student, building up her knowledge of the foundations of the field while also engaging its most cutting-edge questions. Introductions and annotated bibliographies for each debate, preliminary descriptions of each chapter, study questions, and a supplemental guide to further controversies involving values in science help provide clearer and richer snapshots of active controversies for all readers....

        Biographie:

        Kevin C. Elliott is Associate Professor in Lyman Briggs College, the Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, and the Department of Philosophy at Michigan State University. He is the author of Is a Little Pollution Good for You? Incorporating Societal Values in Environmental Research (2011) and A Tapestry of Values: An Introduction to Values in Science (2017), as well as a wide variety of journal articles and book chapters addressing issues in the philosophy of science and practical ethics.

        Daniel Steel is Associate Professor at the W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics at the University of British Columbia. His research focuses on coupled ethical-epistemic issues in science, especially in relation to environmental and public health issues. He is the author of Philosophy and the Precautionary Principle: Science, Evidence, and Environmental Policy (2015) and Across the Boundaries: Extrapolation in Biology and Social Science (2008), as well as numerous articles in leading journals in the philosophy of science.

        Sommaire:

        List of Contributors

        Introduction: Values and Science: Current Controversies

        Kevin C. Elliott and Daniel Steel

        Part I - Epistemic Values: Can We Distinguish Epistemic from Non-Epistemic Values?

        1 Distinguishing Between Cognitive and Social Values

        Hugh Lacey

        2 The Borderlands Between Epistemic and Non-Epistemic Values

        Phyllis Rooney

        Part II - Epistemic Priority: Must Science Be Committed to Prioritizing Epistemic over Non-Epistemic Values?

        3 Qualified Epistemic Priority: Comparing Two Approaches to Values in Science

        Daniel Steel

        4 Values in Science: Against Epistemic Priority

        Matthew J. Brown

        Part III - Inductive Risk: Does the Argument from Inductive Risk Justify Incorporating Non-Epistemic Values in Scientific Reasoning?

        5 Why Inductive Risk Requires Values in Science

        Heather Douglas

        6 Why the Argument from Inductive Risk Doesn?t Justify Incorporating Non-Epistemic Values in Scientific Reasoning

        Gregor Betz

        Part IV - Diversity: Can Social Diversity Be Best Incorporated into Science by Adopting the Social Value Management Ideal?

        7 Can Social Diversity Be Best Incorporated into Science by Adopting the Social Value Management Ideal?

        Kristina Rolin

        8 Feminism, Values, and the Bias Paradox: Why Value Management Is Not Sufficient

        Kristen Intemann

        Part V - Democracy: To Ensure That Scientific Institutions Serve Values of Social Justice and Democracy, Should Biomedical Research Be Socialized?

        9 Socializing Medical Research

        James Robert Brown

        10 Meanwhile, Why Not Biomedical Capitalism?

        Julian Reiss

        Suggestions for Further Reading

        Supplemental Guide to Further Controversies

        Index

        Détails de conformité du produit

        Consulter les détails de conformité de ce produit (

        Personne responsable dans l'UE

        )
        Le choixNeuf et occasion
        Minimum5% remboursés
        Le service clientsÀ votre écoute
        LinkedinFacebookTwitterInstagramYoutubePinterestTiktok
        visavisa
        mastercardmastercard
        klarnaklarna
        paypalpaypal
        floafloa
        americanexpressamericanexpress
        Rakuten Logo
        • Rakuten Kobo
        • Rakuten TV
        • Rakuten Viber
        • Rakuten Viki
        • Plus de services
        • À propos de Rakuten
        Rakuten.com