Is Centralized Control and Decentralized Execution Still Valid? Yes, but It Needs Revitalized - Ely, Mark R.

. .

Résumé :

There is a strong debate among many airmen today over the interpretation of the Air Force's centralized control and decentralized execution tenant. This debate was highlighted recently at three separate Air Command and Staff College (ACSC) lectures.1 Lt Gen (ret) Walter E. Buchanan's lecture to the student class detailed his experiences as an air component commander. He briefly mentioned the concerns over centralized control and decentralized execution.2 This led to numerous student questions addressing the application (or misapplication) of the tenant during recent operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. Next, Gen (ret) Gregory S. Speedy Martin stated during his lecture to the ACSC class the tenant should be considered more as centralized distribution.3 Finally, during a lecture from Lt Col Brian Searcy detailing his experiences as Director of Combat Operations during Afghanistan air operations in 2005, he declared that Phase IV operations are inherently more centralized and that this now is a fact of life.4 He went on to point out that future data link technology will allow operational levels of leadership to have very detailed information from tactical level assets. This will include such items as fuel readings. Overall, these lectures provided excellent examples why there is confusion among airmen today over centralized control and decentralized execution.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.