Space without Air Force Space Command: Organizing around Effects, Not Platforms or Mediums - Caughey, E.

. .

Résumé :

In 2004, the Joint Staff J3 stated that space operators did not have a proper understanding of warfighting and space operations were not sufficiently integrated into warfighting operations. Additionally, the 2001 Commission to Assess United States National Security Space Management and Organization stated there was a lack of confidence in the Air Forces' willingness and ability to fully address the requirement to provide space capabilities. This situation must change. By reviewing the Air Force's organizational journey to incorporate space operations, then examining the problem through the lenses of new operational concepts like effects-based operations, perhaps a alternate way ahead for the Air Force can be found. By using old terms in new ways, one can create a new sight picture or paradigm that will allow a better understanding of space's place in the Air Force. First, air and space are two distinct mediums that support one aerospace mission. Second, effects-based and capabilities-based thinking provide a way to think about military space operations that changes the focus from platforms and mediums to missions and military utility.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.